A Permanent Death - Capital Punishment :: essays research papers

There atomic number 18 five basic reasons that society uses when exalted " penalization" that Ive been able to end from my readings. I will discuss these societal concepts and show that the demolition penalization does not serve to further them. As a result William smith should not be subject to the death penalty and in particular the same should be abolished from our system of " penalisation". DeterrenceDeterrence is fundamentally defined as "the punishment should fit the abomination." Under this concept, the mortal committing the crime and society atomic number 18 prevented from committing this action again. In the case of the death penalty, an individual kills another human and he is "punished" for it by death. Punishment is so-called to be a temporary penalization for a wrongful action. stopping point is far from temporary. One is to learn from ones mistakes. How can the soul learn if they are paying for their mistake with their man ners? In Ernest van den Haags article, "The net Punishment A Defense" he states, "The death penalty is our harshest punishment. It is sealed it ends the existence of those punished, instead of temporarily imprisoning them." (Haag, 251). By imposing the death penalty the individual does not learn from their mistakes and neither does society.EconomyUnder this concept, punishment should be economical. As Haag points out, "...the monetary cost of appealing a crownwork sentence is excessive." (Haag, 253). Further, "...actual monetary costs are trumped by the importance of doing justice." (Haag, 253). to boot there are specific costs associated with keeping an inmate on death row, (i.e. the cost of the specially built prison blocks, the need for maximal security, etc.) and more. These costs clearly out weigh the regular costs incurred to nominate a regular inmate. Deterrence is clearly not served by imposing the death penalty and society aims for justi ce are thwarted. Restitution nightspot demands that the punishment should fix the harm it has done. By sentencing a person to death no harm has been fixed. You can not bring the murdered person back by taking the prisoners life. "Punishment-regardless of the motivation is not intended to revenge, offset, or compensate for the victims suffering or to be measured by it." (Haag, 253). paybackThe community demands that justice be served. Would justice not equally be served and in fact may be better served by life imprisonment? I believe it would be a worse punishment to endure a life sentence in prison.